Re: upcoming changes to TTLs.

From: Duane Wessels <wessels>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 96 09:58:11 -0800 writes:

>> There will be a performance reduction due to the
>> latency time on the IMS check with the source.
>> But it ensure that there will not be a stale object.
>How about an asynchronous IMS? That is, the IMS is sent to the server
>while returning the object from the cache (assuming it is still
>fresh). And this can be done within, say, 20% of the object becoming
>stale. If the object is already stale, then you have to wait for the
>IMS. So you don't have to wait for the IMS unless the object is
>stale. suggested the same thing.

How would you like to specify this in the config file? global option?
stuff it in the refresh_pattern line? what are the parameters?

Duane W.
Received on Mon Oct 28 1996 - 09:58:12 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:33:23 MST