Re: Squid vs. NetCache

From: Marc van Selm <marc.van.selm@dont-contact.us>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 1997 09:32:50 +0100

At 02:06 PM 7/19/97 +0200, Robert Kiessling wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Network Appliance claims that their NetCache is superior to Squid in
>that it is more reliable, faster, has a better user interface and more
>built-in statistics, fully supports HTTP/1.1, and includes all of
>Squid's features (maybe I forgot some arguments). And it also runs
>under NT, but that's nothing I'd need.

Its only just a bit more expensive...

Marc
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc van Selm
NATO C3 Agency
Communication Systems Division, A-Branch
E-Mail: marc.van.selm@nc3a.nato.int
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Private: selm@cistron.nl, selm@het.net, http://www.cistron.nl/~selm
....UNIX IS THE ONLY ANSWER....LINUX IS ALSO FREE....
Received on Mon Jul 21 1997 - 00:38:32 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:35:48 MST