Squid vs. NetCache

From: Robert Kiessling <robert@dont-contact.us>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 1997 14:06:34 +0200 (CEST)


Network Appliance claims that their NetCache is superior to Squid in
that it is more reliable, faster, has a better user interface and more
built-in statistics, fully supports HTTP/1.1, and includes all of
Squid's features (maybe I forgot some arguments). And it also runs
under NT, but that's nothing I'd need.

I would be interested in real-live experience about NetCache. Does it
really behave that much better as they want to make us believe? What
are the drawbacks (other than not having the source code)?

Thanks for your reports,


Robert Kiessling      easynet DV GmbH      Hotline: 0130/126808
network administrator Naegelsbachstr. 25   Tel.:+49 9131 8967 0
robert@easynet.de     D-91052 Erlangen     Fax: +49 9131 8967 8
-----------------------------------------> URL: http://www.easynet.de/
Received on Sat Jul 19 1997 - 05:08:33 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:35:48 MST