Re: Stoopid kwestion...

Recently, Rodney van den Oever talked about "RE: Stoopid kwestion...", and said
>
> read the FAQ will ya!
>
> :-)

Well, according to the FAQ, the answer is no. I had
been hoping someone might have had updated information. :-(

I guess the answer is that the FAQ is still correct,
and Squid cannot handle this case properly. :-( Time
to start coding. :(

Thanks again!

Matt
 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew Petach [SMTP:mattp@Internex.NET]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 1997 8:02 PM
> To: squid-users@nlanr.net
> Subject: Stoopid kwestion...
>
>
> I know y'all are going to tell me to RTFM, so I'll just
> pull out a whip and flog myself as pennance first anyhow,
> but I've got a really stupid configuration question:
>
> Is it possible to configure squid to transparently
> intercept ALL http and ftp requests and cache/proxy
> them without having to modify the end user's browser
> settings? I.e., all traffic on port 80 on a given
> link would have to pass through a squid server running
> on port 80, which would transparently respond to the
> query without the end browser having to re-formulate
> the query in cache-friendly manner.
>
>

-- 
InterNex Information Services   |           Matthew Petach
Network Engineering             |           mpetach@internex.net
2306 Walsh Avenue               |           Tel: (408) 327-2211
Santa Clara, CA  95051          |           Fax: (408) 496-5484