Re: HELP: SQUID 1.1.20 Redirector information

From: David J Woolley <djw@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 20:35:32 +0000

> I get the following from the cache manager. There seems to be
> disproportionate load to Redirector 1 as opposed to the rest. Should it be
> more average compared to the rest?

> redirector #1: 1019131 (1034090 rewrites)
> redirector #2: 7544 (8276 rewrites)
> redirector #3: 1299 (1723 rewrites)

I see no advantage in doing a round robin, as long as squid doesn't
pipeline the requests, and there may be some (very minor) advantage
in that only the dirty pages of the first few redirectors actually
remain in the working set.

About the only reason for doing a round robin would be if one server
could fail in such a way as to accept a request then timeout.

-- 
David Woolley - Office: David Woolley <djw@bts.co.uk>
BTS             Home: <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
Wallington      TQ 2887 6421
England         51  21' 44" N,  00  09' 01" W (WGS 84)
Received on Wed Nov 18 1998 - 13:41:12 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:43:09 MST