In regard to your statements below... I had never realized the
difference. How did you come to this determiniation? I had always
assumed that requests coming through a transparant proxy were handled the
same way as other requests. Both types of requests are logged in the
squid/access.log file by the FQDN (unless perhaps there is no FQDN to
begin with).
If it's true that requests via tproxy and other requests are duplicated...
I definately want a way to fix this, too! :-)
> 2) Sharing transparent vs. non-transparent proxy cache data:
>
> Almost the first thing I realized, once I got it going, was that
> sharing the server between transparent and non-transparent use was not
> the win I thought.
>
> Because the cached data for non-transparent use is hashed and stored
> under the URL based on its FQDN, e.g.
>
> squid.nlanr.net/Squid/FAQ/index.html
>
> and with transparent use the FQDN is not available, so it'll be stored
> under the numeric IP, or the equivalent of (e.g.)
>
> 192.172.226.146/Squid/FAQ/index.html
>
> the two will be stored as completely different files. So there ends up
> being no benefit at all of sharing the server, right?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Jonathan Hall * jonhall@futureks.net * PGP public key available
Systems Admin, Future Internet Services; Goessel, KS * (316) 367-2487
http://www.futureks.net * PGP Key ID: FE 00 FD 51
-= Running Debian GNU/Linux 2.0, kernel 2.0.36 =-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Received on Wed Jun 30 1999 - 20:49:54 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:47:04 MST