RE: Safe_ports - how to deal with ones not listed?

From: Dave J Woolley <DJW@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 1999 14:30:51 -0000

> From: Miguel A.L. Paraz [SMTP:map@iphil.net]
>
> problem ports are the likes of chargen, no? So I allowed 81-65535.
>
PS Port 119 is an example of a port you might regret
leaving open and which is above 80.
Received on Thu Nov 25 1999 - 07:45:38 MST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Simon Rainey: "HTTP status code 000?"
Previous message: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven: "Corruption troubleshooting"
Maybe in reply to: Miguel A.L. Paraz: "Safe_ports - how to deal with ones not listed?"
Next in thread: Dave J Woolley: "RE: Safe_ports - how to deal with ones not listed?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 11:57:32 MDT