Re: RAID or no RAID

From: Matthew King <noodle@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 15:10:29 +1100

Hi.

At 21:26 on 25 Jan 00, Ahsan Khan begun to yabber about "Re: RAID or
no RAID"

Date forwarded: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:47:50 -0800 (PST)
Send reply to: "Ahsan Khan" <ahsank@one.net.pk>
From: "Ahsan Khan" <ahsank@one.net.pk>
To: "Heinz Ahrens" <xf01070@gmx.de>, <squid-users@ircache.net>
Subject: Re: RAID or no RAID
Date sent: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 21:26:18 +0500
Organization: Sun Communication Pvt.
Forwarded by: squid-users@ircache.net

> A physical HD with a separate filesystem is always better in cache
> tech. As the swap file size, Number of objects can be store and many
> other reason. With Regards Ahsan Khan Sr. System Admin Internet
> Division (OneNet) Sun Communication Pvt. Ltd. http://www.one.net.pk

I agree.. On my primary proxy server i have forgone the whole RAID
bit.. I have found that 4 individual drives working indipendantly
work slightly faster than 4 serving as a RAID array..

Cya
Matthew

Matthew King: Sys Admin, Quakers Hill High School.
My ICQ#: 2342475
Message me!

Cellular Phone: +61 415 257 516
E-Mail: noodle@penguinpowered.com
Homepage: http://www.penguinpowered.com/~noodle/

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GIT d+ s: a--- C++++ UL++++ P+ L+++ E---- W++ N++ o++ K w
O- M- V- PS+ PE Y+ PGP- t+ 5++++ X++ R+ tv++ b+++ DI+++++ D++
G+++ e* h* r++ y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Received on Thu Jan 27 2000 - 00:00:58 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:50:44 MST