Re: UFS vs AdvFS

From: David Luyer <david_luyer@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2000 16:22:44 +1000

> Second, which one is better to configured as a cache filesystem, native UFS
> or AdvFS? For performace reason, Digital/Compaq said AdvFS, but I don't know
> how well squid perform on this filesystem. Basically, I just want this
> server running well, any opinion accepted and appreciated... :)

Unless it's changed dramatically, you do _not_ want to run Squid or INN on
AdvFS. It just won't perform under load, use UFS.

David.

-- 
----------------------------------------------
David Luyer
Senior Network Engineer
Pacific Internet (Aust) Pty Ltd
Phone:  +61 3 9674 7525
Fax:    +61 3 9699 8693
Mobile: +61 4 1064 2258, +61 4 1114 2258
http://www.pacific.net.au        NASDAQ: PCNTF
<< fast 'n easy >>
----------------------------------------------
Received on Tue Aug 08 2000 - 00:26:38 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:54:46 MST