Re: [squid-users] more information: squid 2.4.s1 memory usage problem w/solaris 2.6

From: <Torsten.Lange@dont-contact.us>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 11:33:36 +0100

okay,
i guess i'll wait for my new boxes with more ram then.
sorry for being so pig-headed on a clear comment, but i could not believe
that
squid blows up to TEN times as big as the value in cache_mem is set to,
because
the FAQ only says it can be twice or three times as big.

but anyway, thanks for your input

hno@hem.passagen.se@hem.passagen.se on 18.05.2001 08:05:03

To: Torsten.Lange@GECITS-EU.COM
cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] more information: squid 2.4.s1 memory usage
        problem w/solaris 2.6
                                                                            
                                                                            
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------

cache_mem is NOT a limit on how much memory Squid uses. See the Squid
FAQ entry on memory usage.

--
Henrik Nordstrom
Squid Hacker
Torsten.Lange@GECITS-EU.COM wrote:
> i thought i'd have a look at the cache manager mem usage statistics for
the
> solaris boxes
> i experienced the memory trouble with. the output tells me that there
might
> be a problem
> with squid ignoring the cache_mem parameter
> my 'cache_mem' parameter in squid.conf is set to 32 MB.
> i tried and turned off 'memory_pools' to see if there is a problem with
> squid and
> mem allocation in solaris 2.6. same result.
Received on Fri May 18 2001 - 03:35:10 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:00:10 MST