Re: [squid-users] cache size

From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 22:39:14 +0100

As long as you stay within the ram usage limitations (see the Suqid FAQ
for ram vs cache sizing) the size of your cache has marginal impact on
performance, except that hit ratio increases somewhat with larger
caches.

As for cache sizing: Having a cache much bigger than 1 weeks of traffic
is not very cost effective. The cache hitratio benefits of making the
cache larger is marginal and significantly lower than the cost increases
for the server.. (mainly RAM cost, unless you hit 2GB in memory
requirements forcing you to select a 64 bit CPU architecture further
increasing the costs and memory usage..)

Regards
Henrik

Rodney Richison wrote:
>
> Have been lurking and watching, but do not find much info on cache size =
> recommendations and trade-off in speed. Would like, of course to have =
> the largest cache known to man. :)
>
> Machine is 2gz and can put in as much ram as we need.
>
> So if I've 40 or 60 gigs to give squid, will I slow it down by making to =
> big of a cache? I'd like to cache big files as well as small ones =
> without sacrificing speed. In other words, I want my cake and eat it =
> too. :)
>
> I guess my question is, is there a penalty or downside to a giant cache? =
> Any suggestions welcome. I am a newbie.
>
> Highest Regards
> Rodney Richison
> 918-358-1111
> www.rcrnet.net
Received on Thu Feb 06 2003 - 14:42:32 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:13:16 MST