Re: [squid-users] Squid versus Microsoft ISA

From: Raphael Maseko <ralph@dont-contact.us>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 16:39:41 +0200

Hi Carols,
Have you been able to determine that Squid is actually making use of both
processors? Do you have other applications running on the same box?

Ralph

----- Original Message -----
From: <zottmann@ig.com.br>
To: <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 12:42 PM
Subject: RE: [squid-users] Squid versus Microsoft ISA

> Hi !!!
>
> About your statement ...
>
> > Except that with ISA you can use a SMP box. The 2 products have vastly
> > different hardware requirements, if you buy/build a box for squid it
> > will be a 1 CPU box, which would not be a good choice for ISA.
>
> We are using Squid over Red Hat Linux here in a SMP box, and it is running
> fine. Is is a IBM box with two CPUs and 1 GB of memory (seen as four CPUs
by
> the OS due to some hardware feature) and it is dealing with 2200 users,
> handling something like 2gig of throughput.
>
> By using Squid you can also benefit from other open source/free software
> produtcs, like contentfiltering (DansGuardian, Poesia-filter), controlling
> the amount of user traffic per time period (Squid2Mysql), and so on.
>
> Squid also has a very nice feature called "delay pools", that allows you
to
> control bandwidth usage based on user, user groups, file extension, etc...
> I don´t know if MS ISA has something like that.
>
> Regards,
> Carlos.
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Voce quer um iGMail protegido contra vírus e spams?
> Clique aqui: http://www.igmailseguro.ig.com.br
> Ofertas imperdíveis! Link: http://www.americanas.com.br/ig/
>
Received on Fri Dec 05 2003 - 07:33:22 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 12:00:06 MST