Re: [squid-users] Two squid instances based on file types? Is it good?

From: Marco Crucianelli <m.crucianelli@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:17:27 +0100

Thanks for your answer Kevin!

On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 17:09 -0600, Kevin wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:08:30 +0100, Marco Crucianelli
> <m.crucianelli@elis.org> wrote:
> > As I would like to cache normal web stuff and big multimedia files,
> > like videos, I was thinking about using two different squid instances
> > running on two different machine.
>
> You could instead use a single instance with two cache_dir locations, one
> with a relatively low max-size to reserve that directory for "small" objects.
>

Yes, I k now, this was my second option...but I have some doubt on this
solution:

1) can I specify different expiral time for each cache dir? I mean: big
multimedia files do not need to be replaced that often in cache right?

2) supposing to have two different cache dir, the first one for normal
web doc and the second one for big multimedia files, whenever squid
needs space to cache, let's say, another web doc (small file) does it
start applying the replacement policy only on the small file cache_dir
or even in the big file cache dir? I don't want it to purge big
multimedia files, when it needs to cache only a small web doc!!!

> You might also consider setting the maximum_object_size_in_memory
> relatively low, even if you have quite a bit of RAM to work with. I have
> caches with cache_mem set to 2GB, yet I set m_o_s_i_m to 128KB.
>
>
> Kevin Kadow

Well, if I need to cache very big files, let's say about 1GB in size, I
can't set m_o_s to 128kb or I would never cache files bigger than
128kb...Am I wrong?

TIA

Marco
Received on Thu Feb 17 2005 - 02:16:07 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Mar 01 2005 - 12:00:02 MST