Michel Santos wrote:
<snip>
> but fortunatly true that caching performance is in first place a matter of
> fast hardware
> 
> that you can see and not only read common bla-bla I add a well-known mrtg
> graph of the hit rate of a dual-opteron sitting in front of a 4MB/s ISP
> POP
> 
> and I get pretty much more hits as you told at the beginning on larger
> POPs - so I do not know where you get your squid's 1000 req limit from ...
> must be from your P-III goody ;)
> 
> 
<snip>
That RRD you attached.. is that 1600 requests per MINUTE, or was 
something lost in translation?  If it is indeed 1600, that seems awfully 
low, at ~26.667 requests per second.  (I'm comparing these numbers to 
what I achieve with my squid installs -- ~3600 requests/min or 60/sec on 
average; but load tested up to 18000 requests/min or 300/sec stably).
-- Tony Dodd, Systems Administrator Last.fm | http://www.last.fm Karen House 1-11 Baches Street London N1 6DL check out my music taste at: http://www.last.fm/user/hawkeviperReceived on Wed Oct 17 2007 - 00:39:22 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thu Nov 01 2007 - 13:00:01 MDT