Re: [squid-users] Squid-2, Squid-3, roadmap

From: Michael Puckett <Michael.Puckett@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 08:44:24 -0800

Well, I think that Mark is right on the money here. If there is one
killer app that tops all other functionality additions it would be to
multi-thread Squid so that it can perform on multi-cores. You wanted
input from your users on the -2 or -3 roadmaps here it is. With the
current implementation it is impossible to utilize the hardware to
deliver IO performance across multiple NICs. And Async IO is of little
help. And, as has been pointed out there are other areas besides IO
which would benefit as well.

It is very clear now that multi-core CPUs have become the industry
standard. It is becoming more important every day to take advantage of
the HW that is sitting there mostly idle. With a HW trend as clear as
this, if multi-threading is not very high on the development list by now
then something seems wrong with the roadmaps.

-mikep

Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2008, Michael Puckett wrote:
>
>> Mark Nottingham wrote:
>>
>>> A killer app for -3 would be multi-core support (and the perf
>>> advantages that it would bring), or something else that the
>>> re-architecture makes possible that isn't easy in -2. AIUI, though,
>>> that isn't the case; i.e., -3 doesn't make this significantly easier.
>>>
>> Absolutely THE killer app for either -2 or -3. The fact that multi-core
>> processors are now the defacto standard in any box makes this more
>> important by the day IMHO. Being able to do sustained IO across multiple
>> Gb NICs will absolutely require it. This is the single biggest
>> performance enhancement that could be implemented. So where does
>> multi-core support fall on either roadmap?
>>
>
> 12 months away on my draft Squid-2 roadmap, if there was enough commercial
> interest. Thing is, the Squid internals are very horrible for SMP (both 2 and 3)
> and the list of stuff that I've put into the squid-2 roadmap is what I think
> is the minimum amount of work required before really starting to take advantage
> of multiple cores.
>
>
>
>
> Adrian
>
>
Received on Thu Mar 06 2008 - 09:44:42 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 13:00:04 MDT