Re: [squid-users] Squid3 - reason to migrate

From: <admin_at_abp.pl>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:42:18 +0200 (CEST)

Dnia Wt Czerwca 10 2008, 04:19, Amos Jeffries napisał(a):
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is there any reason to migrate to Squid3 (or head snapshot 3.1)?
>> Did anybody do compare functions/performance between 2.6 and 3.x
>> version?
>>
>> I have high load (~400req/s) server with COSS filesystems and tproxy on
>> squid 2.6.18 (now tproxy doesn't work correctly, only transparent
>> proxy).
>>
>
> Under 600req/sec there is no noticible difference in 2.6+/3.x. Tproxy 4
> support may be a reason for you.

What's mean "Under 600req/sec"?
600req/sec on what hardware? Mayby I have slower server than You and there
will be noticable difference?

Tproxy 4.1 is important reason for me (mayby one and only).

> But the COSS support in 3 is buggy with nobody actively testing it.
> you are able to change FS or wanting to assist testing and debugging
> before you migrate, that may be a blocker problem.

It's strange that nobody testing it, it's very good fs.

Another question.
How stable is HEAD 3.1 with working Tproxy?
When will be released stable 3.1?

Regards,

-- 
Tomasz
Received on Tue Jun 10 2008 - 07:46:12 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jun 11 2008 - 12:00:05 MDT