Re: [squid-users] squid (without transparent mode) + Gateway + Authentication on same machine, is it possible ?

> mån 2009-09-14 klockan 16:07 +0200 skrev Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
> > btw, why it isn't possible to use authentication on the same port as
> > "transparent" proxy? Couldn't squid detect if to use authentication just
> > from finding out if the connection was redirected or not?

On 15.09.09 01:21, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> The last part is unfortunately non-trivial on some OS:es where
> getsockname returns the original destination with no indication that the
> request was intercepted. So we assume that all requests arriving on an
> intercept flagged port is intercepted.

original? Don't you mean the current destination, e.g. our local http port?

> Why do you need both on the same port? You can have as many plenty of
> different http_port settings in the same Squid which means that there is
> absolutely no need of using the same port both for interception and
> proxy configuration. Just set up another "random" http_port and change
> your interception rules to direct intercepted traffic there..

I don't need it, i was only wondering about that.

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Support bacteria - they're the only culture some people have.