Re: [squid-users] cache_dir size v.s. available RAM

From: Helmut Hullen <Hullen_at_t-online.de>
Date: 21 Aug 2013 19:20:00 +0200

Hallo, HillTopsGM,

Du meintest am 21.08.13:

> *MY MAIN GOAL: Cache all Windows Updates*

What about "wsusoffline"?

http://www.wsusoffline.net/
http://www.wsusoffline.net/docs/

That may be a better way than using the proxy cache.

There is a Windows and a Linux version.

Viele Gruesse!
Helmut
Received on Wed Aug 21 2013 - 17:25:21 MDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: HillTopsGM: "[squid-users] Re: cache_dir size v.s. available RAM"
Previous message: HillTopsGM: "[squid-users] refresh_pattern >>AND<< reload-into-ims"
In reply to: HillTopsGM: "[squid-users] cache_dir size v.s. available RAM"
Next in thread: HillTopsGM: "[squid-users] Re: cache_dir size v.s. available RAM"
Reply: HillTopsGM: "[squid-users] Re: cache_dir size v.s. available RAM"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Aug 22 2013 - 12:00:10 MDT