Re: [squid-users] Detected DEAD parent

From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 11:22:38 +0200

On 06.08 09:19, SXB6300 Mailing wrote:
> Thx for the answer. I looked the network side, but it seems ok. I have
> ran a ping between each proxy during 4 hours of hight HTTP load, with 0%
> of packet loss and very good response time.

> It 's probably more an overload issue. The load of every proxy is about
> 80-90% during the "working hours" (monitored with mrtg). And since the
> beginning of the summer holidays, the HTTP load has significantly
> increased. I have 5 proxies chained on three parents (each son has 2
> parents defined), and each of the 5 "son proxy" handles between 3000 and
> 4000 HTTP requests/min. These are dl360 compaq CPU 1Ghz with 1GB of RAM
> and scsi drives (and the same for the parent proxies) running on RH9
> with squid 2.5 ; do you think the hardware could be the weak point?

the load average does not say anything in itself...
the CPU usage, idle time, disk usage and idle time, memory usage
- these are needed to know where the problem probably is...

also, do you have all network interfaces set to full duplex?

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
I drive way too fast to worry about cholesterol. 
Received on Tue Aug 10 2004 - 03:22:41 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wed Sep 01 2004 - 12:00:02 MDT